evie/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8998
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

cpufreq: powernow-k6: Fix incorrect comparison with max_multipler

Browse source 
The value of 'max_multiplier' is meant to be used for comparison with
clock_ratio[index].driver_data, not the index itself! Fix the code in
powernow_k6_cpu_exit() that has this bug.

Also, while at it, make the for-loop condition look for CPUFREQ_TABLE_END,
instead of hard-coding the loop count to 8.

Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Srivatsa S. Bhat 2014-04-29 00:24:27 +05:30 • committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 7aa0557fae
commit 237ede16ba
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c
View file

@ -227,8 +227,9 @@ have_busfreq:
static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{ {
unsigned int i; unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
if (i == max_multiplier) for (i = 0; (clock_ratio[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END); i++) {
if (clock_ratio[i].driver_data == max_multiplier)
powernow_k6_target(policy, i); powernow_k6_target(policy, i);
} }
return 0; return 0;