From 2658e4d66deca4c1fc6eb59514bded62dd0a7812 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:04:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] x86/bugs, KVM: Support the combination of guest and host IBRS commit 5cf687548705412da47c9cec342fd952d71ed3d5 upstream. A guest may modify the SPEC_CTRL MSR from the value used by the kernel. Since the kernel doesn't use IBRS, this means a value of zero is what is needed in the host. But the 336996-Speculative-Execution-Side-Channel-Mitigations.pdf refers to the other bits as reserved so the kernel should respect the boot time SPEC_CTRL value and use that. This allows to deal with future extensions to the SPEC_CTRL interface if any at all. Note: This uses wrmsrl() instead of native_wrmsl(). I does not make any difference as paravirt will over-write the callq *0xfff.. with the wrmsrl assembler code. Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar [bwh: Backported to 4.4: This was partly applied before; apply just the missing bits] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 6 ++---- arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 6 ++---- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c index e1f20e0d62c2..f86303592768 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -3904,8 +3904,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * is no need to worry about the conditional branch over the wrmsr * being speculatively taken. */ - if (svm->spec_ctrl) - native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, svm->spec_ctrl); + x86_spec_ctrl_set_guest(svm->spec_ctrl); asm volatile ( "push %%" _ASM_BP "; \n\t" @@ -4017,8 +4016,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (!msr_write_intercepted(vcpu, MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL)) svm->spec_ctrl = native_read_msr(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL); - if (svm->spec_ctrl) - native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0); + x86_spec_ctrl_restore_host(svm->spec_ctrl); /* Eliminate branch target predictions from guest mode */ vmexit_fill_RSB(); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c index f7b5c009859e..0fffd247037b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c @@ -8658,8 +8658,7 @@ static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * is no need to worry about the conditional branch over the wrmsr * being speculatively taken. */ - if (vmx->spec_ctrl) - native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, vmx->spec_ctrl); + x86_spec_ctrl_set_guest(vmx->spec_ctrl); vmx->__launched = vmx->loaded_vmcs->launched; asm( @@ -8797,8 +8796,7 @@ static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (!msr_write_intercepted(vcpu, MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL)) vmx->spec_ctrl = native_read_msr(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL); - if (vmx->spec_ctrl) - native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0); + x86_spec_ctrl_restore_host(vmx->spec_ctrl); /* Eliminate branch target predictions from guest mode */ vmexit_fill_RSB();