From 5bce833c44d53ef5a31b844cf7678ddaeb406624 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:27:30 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] regulator: tps65217: Fix using wrong dev argument for calling of_regulator_match The dev parameter is the device requestiong the data. In this case it should be &pdev->dev rather than pdev->dev.parent. The dev parameter is used to call devm_kzalloc in of_get_regulator_init_data(), which means this fixes a memory leak because the memory is allocated every time probe() is called, thus it should be freed when this driver is unloaded. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c index 73dce7664126..df395187c063 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65217-regulator.c @@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ static struct tps65217_board *tps65217_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!regs) return NULL; - count = of_regulator_match(pdev->dev.parent, regs, - reg_matches, TPS65217_NUM_REGULATOR); + count = of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regs, reg_matches, + TPS65217_NUM_REGULATOR); of_node_put(regs); if ((count < 0) || (count > TPS65217_NUM_REGULATOR)) return NULL; From 08337fdac215d8583770c34e7449c88947aceda8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:31:45 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/8] regulator: tps65910: Fix using wrong dev argument for calling of_regulator_match The dev parameter is the device requesting the data. In this case it should be &pdev->dev rather than pdev->dev.parent. The dev parameter is used to call devm_kzalloc in of_get_regulator_init_data(), which means this fixes a memory leak because the memory is allocated every time probe() is called, thus it should be freed when this driver is unloaded. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c index 59c3770fa77d..b0e4c0bc85c3 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ static struct tps65910_board *tps65910_parse_dt_reg_data( return NULL; } - ret = of_regulator_match(pdev->dev.parent, regulators, matches, count); + ret = of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators, matches, count); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error parsing regulator init data: %d\n", ret); From 36a6f8c035760dcbd0c3acb4c2fd56268588a9cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marek Szyprowski Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:25:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/8] regulator: max8998: fix incorrect min_uV value for ldo10 Correct value for minimal voltage for ldo10 output is 950000 uV. This patch fixes the typo introduced by patch adf6178ad5552a7f2f742a8c85343c50 ("regulator: max8998: Use uV in voltage_map_desc"), what solves broken probe of max8998 in v3.8-rc4. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/max8998.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8998.c b/drivers/regulator/max8998.c index 1f0df4046b86..0a8dd1cbee6f 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/max8998.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/max8998.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static const struct voltage_map_desc ldo9_voltage_map_desc = { .min = 2800000, .step = 100000, .max = 3100000, }; static const struct voltage_map_desc ldo10_voltage_map_desc = { - .min = 95000, .step = 50000, .max = 1300000, + .min = 950000, .step = 50000, .max = 1300000, }; static const struct voltage_map_desc ldo1213_voltage_map_desc = { .min = 800000, .step = 100000, .max = 3300000, From f40cbcb933367aa79fa881baff276b3a4566b563 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:20:29 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 4/8] regulator: max8907: Fix using wrong dev argument for calling of_regulator_match The dev parameter is the device requesting the data. In this case it should be &pdev->dev rather than pdev->dev.parent. The dev parameter is used to call devm_kzalloc in of_get_regulator_init_data(), which means this fixes a memory leak because the memory is allocated every time probe() is called, thus it should be freed when this driver is unloaded. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/max8907-regulator.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8907-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/max8907-regulator.c index d1a77512d83e..d40cf7fdb546 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/max8907-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/max8907-regulator.c @@ -237,8 +237,7 @@ static int max8907_regulator_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) return -EINVAL; } - ret = of_regulator_match(pdev->dev.parent, regulators, - max8907_matches, + ret = of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators, max8907_matches, ARRAY_SIZE(max8907_matches)); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error parsing regulator init data: %d\n", From b19f57589854eef5f5d252e1b63e1f3a212da2ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:24:18 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/8] regulator: max77686: Fix using wrong dev argument at various places Use &pdev->dev rather than iodev->dev for dev_err(). Use &pdev->dev rather than iodev->dev for devm_kzalloc() and of_regulator_match(), this fixes memory leak. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/max77686.c | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max77686.c b/drivers/regulator/max77686.c index b85040caaea3..cca18a3c0294 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/max77686.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/max77686.c @@ -379,9 +379,10 @@ static struct regulator_desc regulators[] = { }; #ifdef CONFIG_OF -static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max77686_dev *iodev, +static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev, struct max77686_platform_data *pdata) { + struct max77686_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct device_node *pmic_np, *regulators_np; struct max77686_regulator_data *rdata; struct of_regulator_match rmatch; @@ -390,15 +391,15 @@ static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max77686_dev *iodev, pmic_np = iodev->dev->of_node; regulators_np = of_find_node_by_name(pmic_np, "voltage-regulators"); if (!regulators_np) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "could not find regulators sub-node\n"); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find regulators sub-node\n"); return -EINVAL; } pdata->num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); - rdata = devm_kzalloc(iodev->dev, sizeof(*rdata) * + rdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rdata) * pdata->num_regulators, GFP_KERNEL); if (!rdata) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not allocate memory for regulator data\n"); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -407,7 +408,7 @@ static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max77686_dev *iodev, rmatch.name = regulators[i].name; rmatch.init_data = NULL; rmatch.of_node = NULL; - of_regulator_match(iodev->dev, regulators_np, &rmatch, 1); + of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators_np, &rmatch, 1); rdata[i].initdata = rmatch.init_data; rdata[i].of_node = rmatch.of_node; } @@ -417,7 +418,7 @@ static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max77686_dev *iodev, return 0; } #else -static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max77686_dev *iodev, +static int max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev, struct max77686_platform_data *pdata) { return 0; @@ -440,7 +441,7 @@ static int max77686_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } if (iodev->dev->of_node) { - ret = max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(iodev, pdata); + ret = max77686_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(pdev, pdata); if (ret) return ret; } From b4895e2ca58a67ebab11f4671cc301fef0eedeb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Axel Lin Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:26:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 6/8] regulator: max8997: Fix using wrong dev argument at various places Use &pdev->dev rather than iodev->dev for dev_err(), dev_warn() and dev_info(). Use &pdev->dev rather than iodev->dev for devm_kzalloc() and of_get_regulator_init_data(), this fixes memory leak. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/max8997.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c index 02be7fcae32f..836908ce505e 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static struct regulator_desc regulators[] = { }; #ifdef CONFIG_OF -static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_dvs_gpio(struct max8997_dev *iodev, +static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_dvs_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev, struct max8997_platform_data *pdata, struct device_node *pmic_np) { @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_dvs_gpio(struct max8997_dev *iodev, gpio = of_get_named_gpio(pmic_np, "max8997,pmic-buck125-dvs-gpios", i); if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "invalid gpio[%d]: %d\n", i, gpio); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid gpio[%d]: %d\n", i, gpio); return -EINVAL; } pdata->buck125_gpios[i] = gpio; @@ -952,22 +952,23 @@ static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_dvs_gpio(struct max8997_dev *iodev, return 0; } -static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev, +static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev, struct max8997_platform_data *pdata) { + struct max8997_dev *iodev = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); struct device_node *pmic_np, *regulators_np, *reg_np; struct max8997_regulator_data *rdata; unsigned int i, dvs_voltage_nr = 1, ret; pmic_np = iodev->dev->of_node; if (!pmic_np) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "could not find pmic sub-node\n"); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find pmic sub-node\n"); return -ENODEV; } regulators_np = of_find_node_by_name(pmic_np, "regulators"); if (!regulators_np) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "could not find regulators sub-node\n"); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find regulators sub-node\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -976,11 +977,10 @@ static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev, for_each_child_of_node(regulators_np, reg_np) pdata->num_regulators++; - rdata = devm_kzalloc(iodev->dev, sizeof(*rdata) * + rdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rdata) * pdata->num_regulators, GFP_KERNEL); if (!rdata) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "could not allocate memory for " - "regulator data\n"); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not allocate memory for regulator data\n"); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -991,14 +991,14 @@ static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev, break; if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(regulators)) { - dev_warn(iodev->dev, "don't know how to configure " - "regulator %s\n", reg_np->name); + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "don't know how to configure regulator %s\n", + reg_np->name); continue; } rdata->id = i; - rdata->initdata = of_get_regulator_init_data( - iodev->dev, reg_np); + rdata->initdata = of_get_regulator_init_data(&pdev->dev, + reg_np); rdata->reg_node = reg_np; rdata++; } @@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev, if (pdata->buck1_gpiodvs || pdata->buck2_gpiodvs || pdata->buck5_gpiodvs) { - ret = max8997_pmic_dt_parse_dvs_gpio(iodev, pdata, pmic_np); + ret = max8997_pmic_dt_parse_dvs_gpio(pdev, pdata, pmic_np); if (ret) return -EINVAL; @@ -1025,8 +1025,7 @@ static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev, } else { if (pdata->buck125_default_idx >= 8) { pdata->buck125_default_idx = 0; - dev_info(iodev->dev, "invalid value for " - "default dvs index, using 0 instead\n"); + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "invalid value for default dvs index, using 0 instead\n"); } } @@ -1040,28 +1039,28 @@ static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev, if (of_property_read_u32_array(pmic_np, "max8997,pmic-buck1-dvs-voltage", pdata->buck1_voltage, dvs_voltage_nr)) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "buck1 voltages not specified\n"); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "buck1 voltages not specified\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (of_property_read_u32_array(pmic_np, "max8997,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage", pdata->buck2_voltage, dvs_voltage_nr)) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "buck2 voltages not specified\n"); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "buck2 voltages not specified\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (of_property_read_u32_array(pmic_np, "max8997,pmic-buck5-dvs-voltage", pdata->buck5_voltage, dvs_voltage_nr)) { - dev_err(iodev->dev, "buck5 voltages not specified\n"); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "buck5 voltages not specified\n"); return -EINVAL; } return 0; } #else -static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct max8997_dev *iodev, +static int max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev, struct max8997_platform_data *pdata) { return 0; @@ -1085,7 +1084,7 @@ static int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } if (iodev->dev->of_node) { - ret = max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(iodev, pdata); + ret = max8997_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(pdev, pdata); if (ret) return ret; } From a2f95c363701deba2205f81929b40222ea6f4f80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Warren Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:01:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 7/8] regulator: clear state each invocation of of_regulator_match of_regulator_match() saves some dynamcially allocated state into the match table that's passed to it. By implementation and not contract, for each match table entry, if non-NULL state is already present, of_regulator_match() will not overwrite it. of_regulator_match() is typically called each time a regulator is probe()d. This means it is called with the same match table over and over again if a regulator triggers deferred probe. This results in stale, kfree()d data being left in the match table from probe to probe, which causes a variety of crashes or use of invalid data. Explicitly free all output state from of_regulator_match() before generating new results in order to avoid this. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c index 6f684916fd79..66ca769287ab 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c @@ -120,6 +120,12 @@ int of_regulator_match(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node, if (!dev || !node) return -EINVAL; + for (i = 0; i < num_matches; i++) { + struct of_regulator_match *match = &matches[i]; + match->init_data = NULL; + match->of_node = NULL; + } + for_each_child_of_node(node, child) { name = of_get_property(child, "regulator-compatible", NULL); From c76edd52bf19c9d01da7edc4ff04d3707c299779 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alim Akhtar Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:02:27 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 8/8] regulator: s2mps11: fix incorrect register for buck10 For BUCK10 the control registers are wrongly set as buck9 control register This patch corrects the control registers for buck10 Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c index bd062a2ffbe2..cd9ea2ea1826 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c @@ -174,9 +174,9 @@ static struct regulator_ops s2mps11_buck_ops = { .min_uV = S2MPS11_BUCK_MIN2, \ .uV_step = S2MPS11_BUCK_STEP2, \ .n_voltages = S2MPS11_BUCK_N_VOLTAGES, \ - .vsel_reg = S2MPS11_REG_B9CTRL2, \ + .vsel_reg = S2MPS11_REG_B10CTRL2, \ .vsel_mask = S2MPS11_BUCK_VSEL_MASK, \ - .enable_reg = S2MPS11_REG_B9CTRL1, \ + .enable_reg = S2MPS11_REG_B10CTRL1, \ .enable_mask = S2MPS11_ENABLE_MASK \ }