igb: fix a few items where weren't correctly setup for mbx timeout
The mailbox timeout routines need to be updated as they were not correctly handling the case of a mailbox timeout and could cause issues with long delays when used. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0acb6fde5f
commit
3272686c98
1 changed files with 14 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -143,12 +143,16 @@ static s32 igb_poll_for_msg(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 mbx_id)
|
||||||
if (!countdown || !mbx->ops.check_for_msg)
|
if (!countdown || !mbx->ops.check_for_msg)
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
while (mbx->ops.check_for_msg(hw, mbx_id)) {
|
while (countdown && mbx->ops.check_for_msg(hw, mbx_id)) {
|
||||||
countdown--;
|
countdown--;
|
||||||
if (!countdown)
|
if (!countdown)
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
udelay(mbx->usec_delay);
|
udelay(mbx->usec_delay);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* if we failed, all future posted messages fail until reset */
|
||||||
|
if (!countdown)
|
||||||
|
mbx->timeout = 0;
|
||||||
out:
|
out:
|
||||||
return countdown ? 0 : -E1000_ERR_MBX;
|
return countdown ? 0 : -E1000_ERR_MBX;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -168,12 +172,16 @@ static s32 igb_poll_for_ack(struct e1000_hw *hw, u16 mbx_id)
|
||||||
if (!countdown || !mbx->ops.check_for_ack)
|
if (!countdown || !mbx->ops.check_for_ack)
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
while (mbx->ops.check_for_ack(hw, mbx_id)) {
|
while (countdown && mbx->ops.check_for_ack(hw, mbx_id)) {
|
||||||
countdown--;
|
countdown--;
|
||||||
if (!countdown)
|
if (!countdown)
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
udelay(mbx->usec_delay);
|
udelay(mbx->usec_delay);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* if we failed, all future posted messages fail until reset */
|
||||||
|
if (!countdown)
|
||||||
|
mbx->timeout = 0;
|
||||||
out:
|
out:
|
||||||
return countdown ? 0 : -E1000_ERR_MBX;
|
return countdown ? 0 : -E1000_ERR_MBX;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -217,12 +225,13 @@ out:
|
||||||
static s32 igb_write_posted_mbx(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size, u16 mbx_id)
|
static s32 igb_write_posted_mbx(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size, u16 mbx_id)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct e1000_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
|
struct e1000_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
|
||||||
s32 ret_val = 0;
|
s32 ret_val = -E1000_ERR_MBX;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!mbx->ops.write)
|
/* exit if either we can't write or there isn't a defined timeout */
|
||||||
|
if (!mbx->ops.write || !mbx->timeout)
|
||||||
goto out;
|
goto out;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* send msg*/
|
/* send msg */
|
||||||
ret_val = mbx->ops.write(hw, msg, size, mbx_id);
|
ret_val = mbx->ops.write(hw, msg, size, mbx_id);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* if msg sent wait until we receive an ack */
|
/* if msg sent wait until we receive an ack */
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue