[SPARC64]: Fix incorrect TSB lock bit handling.
The TSB_LOCK_BIT define is actually a special value shifted down by 32-bits for the assembler code macros. In C code, this isn't what we want. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
96c6e0d8e2
commit
4753eb2ac7
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void copy_tsb(struct tsb *old_tsb, unsigned long old_size,
|
||||||
: "=r" (tag), "=r" (pte)
|
: "=r" (tag), "=r" (pte)
|
||||||
: "r" (&old_tsb[i]), "i" (ASI_NUCLEUS_QUAD_LDD));
|
: "r" (&old_tsb[i]), "i" (ASI_NUCLEUS_QUAD_LDD));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!tag || (tag & TSB_TAG_LOCK))
|
if (!tag || (tag & (1UL << TSB_TAG_LOCK_BIT)))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* We only put base page size PTEs into the TSB,
|
/* We only put base page size PTEs into the TSB,
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -47,13 +47,14 @@
|
||||||
* possible solution is to use RCU for the freeing of the TSB.
|
* possible solution is to use RCU for the freeing of the TSB.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define TSB_TAG_LOCK (1 << (47 - 32))
|
#define TSB_TAG_LOCK_BIT 47
|
||||||
|
#define TSB_TAG_LOCK_HIGH (1 << (TSB_TAG_LOCK_BIT - 32))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define TSB_MEMBAR membar #StoreStore
|
#define TSB_MEMBAR membar #StoreStore
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define TSB_LOCK_TAG(TSB, REG1, REG2) \
|
#define TSB_LOCK_TAG(TSB, REG1, REG2) \
|
||||||
99: lduwa [TSB] ASI_N, REG1; \
|
99: lduwa [TSB] ASI_N, REG1; \
|
||||||
sethi %hi(TSB_TAG_LOCK), REG2;\
|
sethi %hi(TSB_TAG_LOCK_HIGH), REG2;\
|
||||||
andcc REG1, REG2, %g0; \
|
andcc REG1, REG2, %g0; \
|
||||||
bne,pn %icc, 99b; \
|
bne,pn %icc, 99b; \
|
||||||
nop; \
|
nop; \
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue