ACPI / PM: Drop stale comment from acpi_power_transition()
An old comment in acpi_power_transition() indicates that support for ordering power resources needs to be added, but the current code handles that already. Drop the comment to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ebe6afaf0
commit
6656bde5ec
1 changed files with 0 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -710,8 +710,6 @@ int acpi_power_transition(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
|
||||||
|| (device->power.state > ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD))
|
|| (device->power.state > ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD))
|
||||||
return -ENODEV;
|
return -ENODEV;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* TBD: Resources must be ordered. */
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* First we reference all power resources required in the target list
|
* First we reference all power resources required in the target list
|
||||||
* (e.g. so the device doesn't lose power while transitioning). Then,
|
* (e.g. so the device doesn't lose power while transitioning). Then,
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue