arm64: pgtable: implement pte_accessible()
This patch implements the pte_accessible() macro, which can be used to test whether or not a given pte is a candidate for allocation in the TLB. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> (cherry picked from commit 76c714be0e5e60c935a53b31be58939510ba1d0f) Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6329e5d3b7
commit
6e8ef09edf
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -168,6 +168,16 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
|
|||
#define pte_valid(pte) (!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_VALID))
|
||||
#define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
|
||||
((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
|
||||
#define pte_valid_young(pte) \
|
||||
((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_AF)) == (PTE_VALID | PTE_AF))
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Could the pte be present in the TLB? We must check mm_tlb_flush_pending
|
||||
* so that we don't erroneously return false for pages that have been
|
||||
* remapped as PROT_NONE but are yet to be flushed from the TLB.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define pte_accessible(mm, pte) \
|
||||
(mm_tlb_flush_pending(mm) ? pte_present(pte) : pte_valid_young(pte))
|
||||
|
||||
static inline pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue