jbd2: fix incorrect unlock on j_list_lock

commit 559cce698eaf4ccecb2213b2519ea3a0413e5155 upstream.

When 'jh->b_transaction == transaction' (asserted by below)

  J_ASSERT_JH(jh, (jh->b_transaction == transaction || ...

'journal->j_list_lock' will be incorrectly unlocked, since
the the lock is aquired only at the end of if / else-if
statements (missing the else case).

Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Fixes: 6e4862a5bb
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Taesoo Kim 2016-10-12 23:19:18 -04:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 80dbd616ec
commit 795422ec43

View file

@ -1156,6 +1156,7 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_create_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "file as BJ_Reserved"); JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "file as BJ_Reserved");
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock); spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Reserved); __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Reserved);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
} else if (jh->b_transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction) { } else if (jh->b_transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction) {
/* first access by this transaction */ /* first access by this transaction */
jh->b_modified = 0; jh->b_modified = 0;
@ -1163,8 +1164,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_create_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "set next transaction"); JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "set next transaction");
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock); spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
jh->b_next_transaction = transaction; jh->b_next_transaction = transaction;
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
} }
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh); jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
/* /*