bpf/verifier: reject invalid LD_ABS | BPF_DW instruction
[ Upstream commit d82bccc69041a51f7b7b9b4a36db0772f4cdba21 ]
verifier must check for reserved size bits in instruction opcode and
reject BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_DW and BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_DW instructions,
otherwise interpreter will WARN_RATELIMIT on them during execution.
Fixes: ddd872bc30
("bpf: verifier: add checks for BPF_ABS | BPF_IND instructions")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c136901ef
commit
8427d5547d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1348,6 +1348,7 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 ||
|
||||
BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ||
|
||||
(mode == BPF_ABS && insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0)) {
|
||||
verbose("BPF_LD_ABS uses reserved fields\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue