x86: mtrr_cleanup: first 1M may be covered in var mtrrs
The first 1M is don't care when it comes to the variables MTRRs. Cover it as WB as a heuristic approximation; this is generally what we want to minimize the number of registers. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
42fde7a05c
commit
99e1aa17ce
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1293,6 +1293,15 @@ static int __init mtrr_cleanup(unsigned address_bits)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
nr_range = x86_get_mtrr_mem_range(range, 0, extra_remove_base,
|
nr_range = x86_get_mtrr_mem_range(range, 0, extra_remove_base,
|
||||||
extra_remove_size);
|
extra_remove_size);
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* [0, 1M) should always be coverred by var mtrr with WB
|
||||||
|
* and fixed mtrrs should take effective before var mtrr for it
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
nr_range = add_range_with_merge(range, nr_range, 0,
|
||||||
|
(1ULL<<(20 - PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1);
|
||||||
|
/* sort the ranges */
|
||||||
|
sort(range, nr_range, sizeof(struct res_range), cmp_range, NULL);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
range_sums = sum_ranges(range, nr_range);
|
range_sums = sum_ranges(range, nr_range);
|
||||||
printk(KERN_INFO "total RAM coverred: %ldM\n",
|
printk(KERN_INFO "total RAM coverred: %ldM\n",
|
||||||
range_sums >> (20 - PAGE_SHIFT));
|
range_sums >> (20 - PAGE_SHIFT));
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue