drbd: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail
Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail(). spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem. (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b6dd252e6
commit
a506c13a4d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -134,8 +134,7 @@ static void drbd_endio_write_sec_final(struct drbd_peer_request *peer_req) __rel
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->tconn->req_lock, flags);
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->tconn->req_lock, flags);
|
||||||
mdev->writ_cnt += peer_req->i.size >> 9;
|
mdev->writ_cnt += peer_req->i.size >> 9;
|
||||||
list_del(&peer_req->w.list); /* has been on active_ee or sync_ee */
|
list_move_tail(&peer_req->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);
|
||||||
list_add_tail(&peer_req->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Do not remove from the write_requests tree here: we did not send the
|
* Do not remove from the write_requests tree here: we did not send the
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue