evie/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8998
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Merge "ASoC: msm8998: Update supported sample rates for USB backend."

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Linux Build Service Account 2016-12-02 09:02:26 -08:00 • committed by Gerrit - the friendly Code Review server
commit eb564015ba
1 changed files with 48 additions and 11 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

59
sound/soc/msm/msm8998.c
View file

@ -398,7 +398,8 @@ static char const *ch_text[] = {"Two", "Three", "Four", "Five",
static char const *usb_sample_rate_text[] = {"KHZ_8", "KHZ_11P025",
"KHZ_16", "KHZ_22P05",
"KHZ_32", "KHZ_44P1", "KHZ_48",
"KHZ_96", "KHZ_192", "KHZ_384"};
"KHZ_88P2", "KHZ_96", "KHZ_176P4",
"KHZ_192", "KHZ_352P8", "KHZ_384"};
static char const *ext_disp_sample_rate_text[] = {"KHZ_48", "KHZ_96",
"KHZ_192"};
static char const *tdm_ch_text[] = {"One", "Two", "Three", "Four",
@ -1031,12 +1032,21 @@ static int usb_audio_rx_sample_rate_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
switch (usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate) {
case SAMPLING_RATE_384KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 9;
sample_rate_val = 12;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_352P8KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 11;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_192KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 8;
sample_rate_val = 10;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_176P4KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 9;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_96KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 8;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_88P2KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 7;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_48KHZ:
@ -1073,15 +1083,24 @@ static int usb_audio_rx_sample_rate_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
switch (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]) {
case 9:
case 12:
usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_384KHZ;
break;
case 8:
case 11:
usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_352P8KHZ;
break;
case 10:
usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_192KHZ;
break;
case 7:
case 9:
usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_176P4KHZ;
break;
case 8:
usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_96KHZ;
break;
case 7:
usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_88P2KHZ;
break;
case 6:
usb_rx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_48KHZ;
break;
@ -1191,12 +1210,21 @@ static int usb_audio_tx_sample_rate_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
switch (usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate) {
case SAMPLING_RATE_384KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 9;
sample_rate_val = 12;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_352P8KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 11;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_192KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 8;
sample_rate_val = 10;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_176P4KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 9;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_96KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 8;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_88P2KHZ:
sample_rate_val = 7;
break;
case SAMPLING_RATE_48KHZ:
@ -1235,15 +1263,24 @@ static int usb_audio_tx_sample_rate_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
switch (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]) {
case 9:
case 12:
usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_384KHZ;
break;
case 8:
case 11:
usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_352P8KHZ;
break;
case 10:
usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_192KHZ;
break;
case 7:
case 9:
usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_176P4KHZ;
break;
case 8:
usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_96KHZ;
break;
case 7:
usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_88P2KHZ;
break;
case 6:
usb_tx_cfg.sample_rate = SAMPLING_RATE_48KHZ;
break;