Most of the defines are specific to omap1 and omap2+,
and should be in the local headers. Only minimal function
prototypes need to be shared.
As discussed on linux-arm-kernel, we want to avoid
relative includes for the arch/arm/*omap* shared code:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg80520.html
So this patch re-adds a minimal plat/sram.h.
The new plat/sram.h must not be included from drivers,
that will break build for omap2+ CONFIG_MULTIPLATFORM.
Note that this patch temporarily adds two more
relative includes; Those will be removed in the
following patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
This patch fixes sparse warnings due non declarations of static functions.
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:130:13: warning: symbol 'omap_detect_sram' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:216:13: warning: symbol 'omap_map_sram' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:450:12: warning: symbol 'omap_sram_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:348:12: warning: symbol 'omap242x_sram_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:369:12: warning: symbol 'omap243x_sram_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:425:12: warning: symbol 'omap34xx_sram_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:441:12: warning: symbol 'omap44xx_sram_init' was not declared. Should it be static
arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c:36:6: warning: symbol 'omap_mcbsp_write' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c:50:5: warning: symbol 'omap_mcbsp_read' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c:65:6: warning: symbol 'omap_mcbsp_st_write' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c:70:5: warning: symbol 'omap_mcbsp_st_read' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/mcbsp.c:1648:15: warning: symbol 'omap_st_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c:414:15: warning: symbol 'omapfb_reserve_sram' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c:43:5: warning: symbol 'omap_verify_speed' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c:61:14: warning: symbol 'omap_getspeed' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Manjunath Kondaiah G <manjugk@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Patch from Tony Lindgren
This patch syncs the mainline kernel with linux-omap tree.
The highlights of the patch are:
- Serial port and framebuffer init improvments by Imre Deak
- Common omap pin mux framework by Tony Lindgren
- Common omap clock framework by Tony Lindren
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Patch from Tony Lindgren
This patch syncs the mainline kernel with linux-omap tree.
The highlights of the patch are:
- Clock updates by Tuukka Tikkanen, Juha Yrjola,
Daniel Petrini and Tony Lindgren
- DMA fixes by Imre Deak, Juha Yrjola and Daniel Petrini
- Add support to dual-mode hardware timers by Lauri Leukkunen
- GPIO support for 24xx by Paul Mundt
- GPIO wake-up support by Tony Lindgren
- Better GPIO interrupt handler to not lose interrupts by
Ralph Walden and Ladislav Michl
- Power Management updates by Tuukka Tikkanen
- Make Power Management code use new SRAM functions by
Tony Lindgren
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
