Now the MFD API is Device Tree aware we can use it for platform
registration again, even when booting with DT enabled. To aid in
Device Node pointer allocation we provide each cell with the
associative compatible string.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Now of_regulator_match() returns without finding the match if match->of_node
is not NULL.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
There is multiple voltage input pins on device which
takes the voltage input for different voltage regulator.
Support to configure the voltage input supplied by
different regulator for each regulators.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Since DT doesn't provide an idiomatic mechanism for enabling full
constraints and since it's much more natural with DT to provide them
just assume that a DT enabled system has full constraints.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Add support for input supply in DT parsing of node.
The input supply will be provided by the property
"vin-supply" in the regulator node.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This patch device tree support for regulator driver. It uses the parent
(mfd's) DT node to parse the regulator data for max77686.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
With changes introduced by commit 222cc7b (regulator: core: Allow
multiple requests of a single supply mapping) on create_regulator,
regulator_put needs a corresponding update on sysfs entry removing.
Also regulator->dev still needs to get assigned in create_regulator,
otherwise, sysfs_remove_link call in regulator_put will get bypassed.
Reported-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
It is ok to request current limit with min_uA < chip->min_uA and
max_uA > chip->max_uA.
We need to set min_uA = chip->min_uA if (min_uA < chip->min_uA),
this ensures the equation to calcuate selator does not return negative number.
Also set max_uA = chip->max_uA if (max_uA > chip->max_uA), as suggested by
Sonic.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This is essentially the code that was factored out into the core when the
feature was implemented.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
It is very common for regulators to support having their enable signal
controlled by a GPIO. Since there are a bunch of fiddly things to get
right like handling the operations when the enable signal is tied to
a rail and it's just replicated code add support for this to the core.
Drivers should set ena_gpio in their config if they have a GPIO control,
using ena_gpio_flags to specify any flags (including GPIOF_OUT_INIT_ for
the initial state) and ena_gpio_invert if the GPIO is active low. The
core will then override any enable and disable operations the driver has
and instead control the specified GPIO.
This will in the future also allow us to further extend the core by
identifying when several enable signals have been tied together and
handling this properly.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Create new _regulator_do_enable() and _regulator_do_disable() operations
which deal with the mechanics of performing the enable and disable, partly
to cut down on the levels of indentation and partly to support some future
work.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Many regulators have a fixed specification for their enable time. Allow
this to be set in the regulator_desc as a number to save them having to
implement an explicit operation.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Lots of regulator drivers have checks in their map_voltage() functions
to verify that the result of the mapping is in the range originally
specified. Factor these out in the core and provide a bit of extra
defensiveness for other drivers by doing the check in the core.
Since we're now doing a list_voltage() earlier move the current mapping
back to a voltage out into the set_voltage() call to save redoing it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Currently regulator_is_supported_voltage() works by enumerating the set
of voltages which can be set by the regulator but the checks we're doing
to impose constraints mean that if we can't vary the voltage we'll not
report any voltages as supported even though the regulator is actually
set at that voltage.
We could fix the voltage listing but this would mean that list_voltage()
could end up going to the hardware to get the current voltage which isn't
expected (it's supposed to be very cheap) so instead special case things
when we can't change the voltage and compare the requested range against
the current voltage.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
A recursive lockdep warning occurs if you call
regulator_set_optimum_mode() on a regulator with a supply because
there is no nesting annotation for the rdev->mutex. To avoid this
warning, get the supply's load before locking the regulator's
mutex to avoid grabbing the same class of lock twice.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.4.0 #3257 Tainted: G W
---------------------------------------------
swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
(&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036e9e0>] regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38
but task is already holding lock:
(&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&rdev->mutex);
lock(&rdev->mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
#0: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb48>] __driver_attach+0x40/0x8c
#1: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c03dbb58>] __driver_attach+0x50/0x8c
#2: (&rdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c036ef38>] regulator_set_optimum_mode+0x24/0x224
stack backtrace:
[<c001521c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x12c) from [<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080)
[<c00cc4d4>] (validate_chain+0x760/0x1080) from [<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10)
[<c00cd744>] (__lock_acquire+0x950/0xa10) from [<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8)
[<c00cd990>] (lock_acquire+0x18c/0x1e8) from [<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4)
[<c080c248>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x68/0x3c4) from [<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38)
[<c036e9e0>] (regulator_get_voltage+0x18/0x38) from [<c036efb8>] (regulator_set_optimum_mode+0xa4/0x224)
...
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Match the device's regulators with the property of
"regulator-compatible" of each regulator node.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
It is ok to request voltage with min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV and
max_uV > tps->info[rid]->max_uV.
The equation we used in uv_to_vsel() does not allow
min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV, otherwise it returns negative selector.
So we need to set min_uV = tps->info[rid]->min_uV if
min_uV < tps->info[rid]->min_uV.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This permits the setting of bogus values because the invalidity check is
itself invalid.
Reported-by: dcb314@hotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This patch refactors the code to get rid of the fixed_ilimsel and FIXED_ILIMSEL
flag usage, and convert all the fixed ilimsel to table based (with one entry in
the table).
We can differentiate fixed ilimsel by checking info->n_ilimsels == 1,
thus FIXED_ILIMSEL flag can be removed.
This change makes the logic of the code simpler as all the ilimsels are table
based now.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This patch adds fixed_5000000_voltage table for fixed voltage,
so we can convert regulator_ops to regulator_list_voltage_table.
We can differentiate fixed voltage by checking rdev->desc->n_voltages == 1,
thus remove the FIXED_VOLTAGE flag usage.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
of_get_named_gpio() needs the driver hosting the GPIO that the DT
property references to have been probed. Detect this specific failure,
and defer the probe of the whole regulator until this API can complete.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Convert tps65217_pmic_ldo1_ops to use regulator_list_voltage_table.
We have n_voltages and volt_table settings in regulator_desc,
so we don't need the table and table_len fields in struct tps_info.
Thus remove them from struct tps_info.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
commit 222cc7b1 (regulator: core: Allow multiple requests of a single supply mapping)
removed the usage of get_device_regulator().
Remove the function definition too amd get rid of the following warning:
drivers/regulator/core.c:112:26: warning: 'get_device_regulator' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Sometimes it may be useful to allow a device to request a supply multiple
times, for example in order to allow framework management of some uses of
the supply with some additional driver specific management or in order to
allow multiple children of an MFD to work with the supply. Currently this
is not possible due to the creation of
Solve this by removing the requested_uA entry (we have no current users
of this feature anyway) and ignoring errors creating the symlink to the
consumer. We should do something nicer than this as this causes sysfs to
spew enormous warnings but it allows users to run for now.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
There is no need to consider waiting for the voltage to ramp if we
didn't manage to set it and looking at the return value is going to be
cheaper than is_enabled().
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
In current code, .list_voltage and .set_voltage_sel callbacks for BUCK7 and
BUCK8 return -EINVAL.
This patch adds s5m8767_buck78_ops for BUCK7 and BUCK8 which does not set
.list_voltage, .get_voltage_sel and .set_voltage_sel. ( This has the same
effect of returning -EINVAL in the callbacks)
Then for all the users of s5m8767_list_voltage, we don't need to worry about
the case reg_voltage_map[reg_id] is NULL.
So we can convert s5m8767_list_voltage to regulator_list_voltage_linear.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
If min_uV is in the range of: 3250001~3269999,
current code uses the equation:
selector = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 1700000, 50000);
Then selector will be 32.
Then arizona_micsupp_list_voltage returns -EINVAL for this case which is wrong.
This patch fixes this issue:
If min_uV > 3200000, selector should be ARIZONA_MICSUPP_MAX_SELECTOR.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Arizona class devices feature an integrated LDO which is intended to
supply the digital core for the device. Provide a driver offering
minimal control of this regulator.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
As s5m8767a is revisioned, ramp_delay register is changed.
5mV/uS, 10mV/uS, 25mV/uS, 50mV/uS, 100mV/uS ramp delay can be selected.
Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJP53AxAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGs2QH/RaqkXz96fwjhDcyiKpDqA3c
kGuS5mz5cOhnqKSmR88HFm6pwuhLux/qSJzeAmoQy1MC8a0ACx7AnANW0lfN3/qe
/HGYz8h60yCL/fhn8/bUYtdt9xsoDqoDcq/ooFl9mcsJGWbC6WeMSZU5dAUYqviE
qFrp5zjY07FG53CRGT0hFpezQNwNL+VLH30CF9LD+fJLPVEYum2zBNGXWM42rcw5
fxzGL/6SO8YqA/Upic1ht6HAd6s5LOrlST7qvnyXUMvRXN5z/Y92ueYJZefkS1Om
ohuLIKM2bv9/dJS67H8N2baSKGCzBdfSe5/5WaHdLYW9MiVju0wRl6HPJtAMrkk=
=H8t8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v3.5-rc4' into regulator-drivers
Linux 3.5-rc4 contains patches which conflict with some of the
development work.
With this change, regulator_set_voltage_time_sel() can be more generic and not
limited to linear and table based mapping now.
One side-effect of this change is that list_voltage() must be implemented.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The chip_id is not used.
The voltage_base is not necessary, set base voltage to tps->desc.min_uV instead.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
I forgot to apply the offsets for the regmap helper functions for
enable/disable on SMPS10 and the LDO regulators. This means regulators
will not enable/disable correctly.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Tested-by: Sebastien Guiriec <s-guiriec@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
