arm/arm64: smccc-1.1: Handle function result as parameters
[ Upstream commit 755a8bf5579d22eb5636685c516d8dede799e27b ]
If someone has the silly idea to write something along those lines:
extern u64 foo(void);
void bar(struct arm_smccc_res *res)
{
arm_smccc_1_1_smc(0xbad, foo(), res);
}
they are in for a surprise, as this gets compiled as:
0000000000000588 <bar>:
588: a9be7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-32]!
58c: 910003fd mov x29, sp
590: f9000bf3 str x19, [sp, #16]
594: aa0003f3 mov x19, x0
598: aa1e03e0 mov x0, x30
59c: 94000000 bl 0 <_mcount>
5a0: 94000000 bl 0 <foo>
5a4: aa0003e1 mov x1, x0
5a8: d4000003 smc #0x0
5ac: b4000073 cbz x19, 5b8 <bar+0x30>
5b0: a9000660 stp x0, x1, [x19]
5b4: a9010e62 stp x2, x3, [x19, #16]
5b8: f9400bf3 ldr x19, [sp, #16]
5bc: a8c27bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp], #32
5c0: d65f03c0 ret
5c4: d503201f nop
The call to foo "overwrites" the x0 register for the return value,
and we end up calling the wrong secure service.
A solution is to evaluate all the parameters before assigning
anything to specific registers, leading to the expected result:
0000000000000588 <bar>:
588: a9be7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-32]!
58c: 910003fd mov x29, sp
590: f9000bf3 str x19, [sp, #16]
594: aa0003f3 mov x19, x0
598: aa1e03e0 mov x0, x30
59c: 94000000 bl 0 <_mcount>
5a0: 94000000 bl 0 <foo>
5a4: aa0003e1 mov x1, x0
5a8: d28175a0 mov x0, #0xbad
5ac: d4000003 smc #0x0
5b0: b4000073 cbz x19, 5bc <bar+0x34>
5b4: a9000660 stp x0, x1, [x19]
5b8: a9010e62 stp x2, x3, [x19, #16]
5bc: f9400bf3 ldr x19, [sp, #16]
5c0: a8c27bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp], #32
5c4: d65f03c0 ret
Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
8ca266df65